
This is the third in a series of articles that focuses on electrical inspection
methods and technologies performed while the electrical system remains
energized. Although no-outage inspections can be very valuable tools, always
remember to comply with proper safety guidelines when conducting the energized
“on-line” inspections.
Instrumentation
Infrared equipment used for electrical inspections range anywhere from
handheld spot thermometers to sophisticated imaging devices with high-resolution
thermal and visual color displays. The popularity of infrared technology is
apparent today by the wide price range and variety of instruments available. For
the successful service provider, instrument cost is secondary to having equipment
that provides high-resolution images and allows for accurate and efficient
report writing. Features such as user-friendly software can automate the process
of collecting, reporting, and archiving infrared images and thermal data. Sophisticated
features such as Blue Tooth voice comment recording, built-in auxiliary
laser target-pointing devices, and visual (conventional camera-type) imaging can
add to the instrument cost but can greatly assist report accuracy and efficiency.
When choosing an infrared instrument, one must consider these features along
with their associated costs.
Personnel Qualifications
The following statement obtained directly from the NETA Maintenance Testing
Specifications summarizes the need to have Infrared Technicians possess a
broad range of both electrical and thermography experience. “It is a necessary and
valid requirement that the person performing the electrical inspection be thoroughly
trained and experienced concerning the apparatus and systems being evaluated as well
as knowledgeable of thermographic methodology.” Without extensive experience
and training in both disciplines, improper diagnostics may result in unnecessary
repairs, or leaving the customer with misinformation that results in reduced
electrical reliability.
Typical Applications
For electrical systems, infrared
instruments are generally used to
identify current-carrying conductor
anomalies. Over time, connections
become loose from cycling temperature
variations due to loading
fluctuations and vibration associated
with electrical equipment operation
along with many other factors.
Higher resistances occur across
these problem connections, and
heat is created based on the associated
I2R losses. Heat is indirectly
measured by the objects emissivity
using the infrared instrument.
Left unattended, these problem
connections worsen over time and
eventually lead to complete failure.
Infrared technology is capable of
identifying these problems and
should be incorporated into annual
maintenance plans. Other conductor
problems that generate heat
and can be detected by infrared
instruments include overloaded
circuits and circuits with substantial
harmonic content. Dirty, corroded,
and damaged connections or faulty
contacts can also be detected.
Benefits
A major insurance carrier estimates
that approximately 25 percent
of all electrical failures are attributed
to faulty electrical connections.
Therefore, many insurance firms are
the driving force behind requiring
facilities to conduct annual infrared
NETA WORLD Winter 2006-2007 www.netaworld.org
surveys. Infrared technology has evolved into one of the best overall technologies
for preventing failures and has the added benefit of not requiring an outage
to perform, as it can be done on line. Several additional benefits of infrared
technology are listed below:
- The testing is nondestructive.
- Infrared technology allows you to “see” the thermal image.
- The results can be trended and compared to previous results.
- Pictures taken of the problems can provide a record of the problem.
- The results may be used for prioritizing repairs.
- The infrared survey is relatively economical.
- The technology helps increase reliability.
- The technology is predictive in that it identifies problems before complete
failure or damage occurs, thus allowing for a proactive maintenance approach
or program!
When Is It a Problem?
It is not necessarily easy to properly detect and diagnose an electrical problem
with infrared technology. This is why having a technician with the right combination
of electrical and thermography experience is so important. Technical
knowledge and field experience in electrical testing are mandatory prerequisites
for nonroutine problem identification and for recommending corrective actions.
However, the following guideline taken from NETA Maintenance Testing Specifications
provides a good general reference in regards to temperature differences
and their associated severity level.
TABLE 100.18 - Thermographic Survey
Suggested Actions Based on Temperature Rise
| Temperature difference
(ΔT) based on comparisons
between similar
components under similar
loading. |
Temperature difference (ΔT) based
upon comparisons between component
and ambient air temperatures. |
Recommended
Action |
| 1°C - 3°C |
1°C - 10°C |
Possible deficiency;
warrants investigation |
| 4°C - 15°C |
11°C - 20°C |
Indicates probable
deficiency; repair as
time permits |
| ------ |
21°C - 40°C |
Monitor until corrective
measures can be
accomplished |
| >15°C |
>40°C |
Major discrepancy;
repair immediately |
Temperature specifications vary depending on the exact type of equipment.
Even in the same class of equipment (i.e., cables) there are various
temperature ratings. Heating is generally related to the square of the current;
therefore, the load current
will have a major impact on ?T.
In the absence of consensus
standards for ?T, the values in
this table will provide reasonable
guidelines.
An alternative method of evaluation
is the standards-based
temperature rating system as
discussed in Section 8.9.2, Conducting
an IR Thermographic
Inspection, Electrical Power
Systems Maintenance and Testing
by Paul Gill, PE, 1998.
It is a necessary and valid requirement
that the person performing
the electrical inspection
be thoroughly trained and experienced
concerning the apparatus
and systems being evaluated as
well as knowledgeable of thermographic
methodology.
It should be noted that many times
the problem might be the absence of
heat or less heat than other similar
conductors or items. One example
is parallel conductors where one (or
more) of a group is not conducting
their proportional share of the total
current. Another example is poorly
balanced single-phase loads on a
three-phase transformer or distribution
system.
Additional Infrared
Applications
In addition to typical conductor
problems that are commonly detected
by infrared equipment, there is an
ever-growing number of additional applications
that can be useful provided
that the technician’s imagination and
experience is utilized when analyzing
electrical systems. Some examples of
these less-common applications are
described below.
Transformers
The liquid level of fluid-filled transformers
is critical for the performance
and longevity of the transformer. Liquid
level gauges can become damaged
or illegible over time causing unreliable
indication. Infrared imaging of
the transformer can often detect fluid
levels and radiator convection cooling
problems. The thermal image below shows a very warm
transformer main tank and very cool radiators indicating a
low transformer fluid level, which is preventing the radiators
from functioning. This problem can lead to transformer
overheating which creates abnormal thermal stress on the
paper winding insulation and results in reduced transformer
life.
Another infrared application for fluid-filled transformers
is to compare the temperature of the load tap-changer
(LTC), if so equipped, to that of the main tank. Generally,
the main tank temperature should be warmer than
the isolated LTC tank. Similar temperatures can indicate
dangerous leaks between the two tanks or severe “coking”
or arc debris buildup on the LTC contacts.
Overheating of dry type transformer core assemblies can
provide indication of serious core delamination problems
which can allow eddy currents that are responsible for
inefficiencies resulting in increased thermal and electrical
losses. This abnormal heating also causes winding insulation
deterioration and reduces the life of the transformer. Associated
follow-up electrical tests should include checking
for proper operating voltages, individual phase loading and
balance, and an analysis of harmonic content of the load.
Switchgear
A great deal of investment is presently being made in the
installation of thermal viewing ports for switchgear. These
ports allow infrared inspections to be performed without
removing switchgear covers, thus significantly reducing
or eliminating worker arc-flash exposure. The installation
of permanent infrared sensors and continuous infrared
monitors are also viable methods for recognizing potential
thermal failures of critical equipment.
The integrity of outdoor switchgear assemblies is often
compromised by defective strip heaters. The strip heaters
increase the switchgear temperature slightly above ambient
in order to prevent condensation during daily or seasonal
temperature changes. The functionality of these strip heaters
and their effectiveness to perform this duty can be determined
by performing thermal imaging of the switchgear
enclosures. In other words, and once again, the absence of
heating identifies a potential problem.
Medium-Voltage Splices and Terminations
Although many problems associated with splice and termination
components are related to insulation failure that
can be identified by on-line partial discharge surveys, still
many problems are associated with conductor integrity. Several
utilities require infrared scanning of underground vault
splice assemblies before personnel are allowed into these
areas. In this capacity, infrared is used as both a safety and a
reliability tool. Additional infrared applications include the
inspection of pad-mounted transformer premolded elbow
assemblies. One utility estimated that approximately 30
percent of its elbows had been found with thermal problems
due to connection, probe, or crimp deficiencies.
Low-Voltage Bus Duct
Low-voltage bus duct assemblies are popular for facility
applications that require distributing high currents for long
distances due to their lower installation cost compared to
conduit and cable. Although very reliable, these assemblies
are very difficult to test by conventional methods due to
limited access caused by their construction. Infrared inspections
are one of the few technologies that can help identify
bus segment contact problems at joints. Infrared inspections
must generally be performed by scanning the outside bus
duct enclosure. Although significant air gaps exist between
the bus and enclosure, this technique has been successful
in detecting connection problems. Without detailed internal
bus construction information available, the technician
should investigate even slight temperature differences occurring
at the enclosure near bus segment connection points
or coupling joints.
Additionally, bus-plugs or bus-taps depend on a very
limited amount of contact area. These points of contact
are further dependant on spring tension and are, therefore,
especially vulnerable to overheating conditions. Many times
this is caused by conducted heat from failing contacts or
terminations within the bus-plug assembly.
Heat run tests, also known as continuous-current, temperature-
rise tests, are generally conducted by the manufacturer
in order to verify adequate conductor size for the
application. However, occasionally applying high currents
to bus or circuit breakers in the field can reveal problems
that may not be apparent during normal operation. The cost
of performing this test generally limits its use to problem
troubleshooting when other testing avenues have been
exhausted.
Noncurrent-Carrying Items
Many times other problems can be spotted with ancillary
items which normally do not carry current and, therefore,
(mistakenly) are not part of the normal infrared survey.
Thermographers, experienced in the vastness of potential
problems, will many times glance around in their field of
view and spot other items radiating heat (or not radiating
heat), which will raise their curiosity level to the point of a
closer look. Many times a metallic structural support, cableway,
or cable tray assembly, none of which should be carrying
current, will indicate heating that is apparently from
electrical current flowing. Field measurements of hundreds
of amperes have been seen numerous times and are most
commonly the result of excessive eddy currents caused by
inductive heating. This heating effect can cause the surface
temperature to rise well beyond the boiling point of water,
potentially presenting a burn hazard to personnel or the
deterioration of other substances in close proximity.
Grounding connections normally do not carry continuous
current; therefore, a ground connection showing any increase
in temperature can indicate a possible problem. Further
investigations of these types of problems have uncovered a
variety of issues, such as ground loops, broken or disconnected
grounds, and high impedance faults.
Conclusion
The infrared survey is a great initial screening or detection
tool for potential problems, but additional electrical tests
should be performed in order to confirm initial conclusions.
It is extremely easy to have a false positive thermal image;
therefore, other measurements such as millivolt drop tests,
current readings, harmonic analysis, power factor, and others
should be performed on suspect observations. These
additional tests are mandatory as certifiable test results
may be necessary or required for investigative or litigation
purposes.
Deluxe or premium camera systems can fix many field
errors after the image has been stored, but basic fundamental
errors such as focus, range, or distance cannot be corrected
after the survey. Additional common mistakes are incorrect
emissivity settings or assumptions and reflected or indirect
contributions.
Lastly, the infrared survey remains one of the best overall
tools for detecting potential electrical problems. The popularity
of the technology and the low cost of equipment have
allowed nonexperts to implement infrared survey programs.
However, the additional cost associated with upper-end
equipment and experienced technicians with certified training
may very well be worth every penny when important
decisions are made based upon infrared survey results.
Mr. Genutis received his BSEE from Carnegie Mellon University,
has been a NETA Certified Technician for 15 years, and is a Certified
Corona Technician. Don has nearly twenty-five years of practical field
and laboratory electrical testing experience. He is presently serving as
Vice President of the Group CBS Eastern U.S. Operations and acts as
Technical Manager for their subsidiary, Circuit Breaker Sales & Service
located in Central Florida.
Other Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Harold Orum of Halco
Service in Los Angeles, CA for his valuable assistance
with this article. Harold is a NETA Affiliate and has accumulated
more decades of electrical experience than he
will admit to.
|